Shared June 28, 2018
Clinton Body Count Epstein Suicided Mena Iran Contra Barry Seal Medellin PART 2 - Railroad Murders
PART 1 HERE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJ1hQ...
PART 2 HERE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yL229...
PART 3 HERE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGhLt...
PART 4 HERE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lQ4-q...
PLEASE sign our petition in support of the Neuro-Specific Human Rights Bill here: http://chng.it/pkCvhRMS
Watch our latest video describing the bill here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gFLBr...
Our website: http://www.globalneuroethics.com
Our GoFundMe campaign: https://www.gofundme.com/global-neuro...
Please help us enact the Neuro-Specific Human Rights Bill into legislation by sharing the links above on all social media platforms!
Watch my latest documentary regarding the current epidemic of human experimentation/torture/murder here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SF3g_...
“Nothing was your own except the few cubic centimetres inside your skull.” -George Orwell, 1984
The quoted sentence conveys the idea that the mind is a kind of last refuge of personal freedom and self-determination. While the body can easily be subject to domination and control by others, our mind, along with our thoughts, beliefs and convictions, are to a large extent beyond external constraint. Yet, with advances in neural engineering, brain imaging and pervasive neurotechnology, the mind might no longer be such an unassailable fortress. Today, pervasive neurotechnology applications include brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) for device control or real-time neuromonitoring, neurosensor-based vehicle operator systems, cognitive training tools, electrical and magnetic brain stimulation, wearables for mental wellbeing, and virtual reality systems. Mental decoders are capable of decoding mental states and translating them into observable outputs such as text, verbal signals or graphic images. For example, Herff and Mirkovic have independently demonstrated the effectiveness of a decoder capable of reconstructing speech from brain waves. While these advances can be greatly beneficial for individuals and society, they can also be misused and create unprecedented threats to the freedom of the mind and to the individuals' capacity to freely govern their behavior.
Rapid advancements in human neuroscience and neurotechnology open unprecedented possibilities for accessing, collecting, sharing and manipulating information from the human brain. Such applications raise important challenges to human rights principles that need to be addressed to prevent misuse or unintended negative consequences. This proposal assesses the implications of emerging neurotechnology applications in the context of the human rights framework and suggests that existing human rights are not sufficient to respond to these emerging issues. After analysing the relationship between neuroscience and human rights, we identify four new neuro-specific human rights that will be vital in the effort of protecting the human brain: the right to cognitive liberty, the right to mental privacy, the right to mental integrity, and the right to psychological continuity.
The volume and variety of neurotechnology applications is rapidly increasing inside and outside the clinical and research setting. The ubiquitous distribution of cheaper, scalable and easy-to-use neuroapplications has the potential of opening unprecedented opportunities at the brain-machine interface level and making neurotechnology intricately embedded in our everyday life. While this technological trend may generate immense advantage for society in many ways, its implications for ethics and the law remain largely unexplored. We argue that in the light of the disruptive change that neurotechnology is determining in the digital ecosystem, the normative terrain should be urgently prepared to prevent misuse or unintended negative consequences. In addition, given the fundamental character of the neurocognitive dimension, we argue that such normative response should not exclusively focus on tort law but also on foundational issues at the level of human right law.
The freedom of thought, freedom from slavery, torture and inhumane or degrading treatment or punishment are regarded by international human rights law as not subject to any exceptions and, therefore, as absolute rights. Absolute rights cannot be limited for any reason. No circumstance justifies a qualification or limitation of absolute rights. Absolute rights cannot be suspended or restricted, even during a declared state of emergency. The right to cognitive liberty, the right to mental privacy, the right to mental integrity, and the right to psychological continuity should also be enacted into law as absolute rights.
Who Killed Pablo Escobar? Truth Told by DEA Agents
Air Disasters: Deadly Descent (Full Episode)
Living on US-Mexico Border, Native Americans Face Daily Struggles
The Mennonite Drug Connection - the fifth estate
John Gotti’s Hitman Exposes The Dark Side of Mafia
Glenn Beck Presents: The Democrats’ Hydra
Undercover FBI Agent Exposes Sinaloa Cartel & La Cosa Nostra
Mugshots: Sandy Murphy - Death of a Casino King
Confessions of The Mafia Hitman for Tony Spilotro
Mickey Munday: The Cocaine Cowboy I Finding Escobar's Millions
Annie Jacobsen, "Operation Paperclip"
Nazi Gold | Secrets Of War (WWII Documentary) | Timeline
Innocent man sent to jail for rape by his own fiancé | 60 Minutes Australia
Harvey Weinstein: The fall of the king of Hollywood
Ecstasy Kingpin Reveals His Experience with Mexican Mafia & Sammy The Bull
America's Worst Heist: The Unperfect Crime (Crime Documentary) | Real Stories
Lottery fraud : Lucky 7 - the fifth estate